Get Free Checker

How To Use Coreferent In A Sentence

  • In these cases it is obvious that the pronouns don't refer, so they can't be coreferential with their antecedents, either. Discourse Representation Theory
  • You also note that all examples of this construction have the coreferential pronoun in subject position; i.e. exactly where it would be if this were an infinitive complement instead of a that complement.
  • The annotation of coreferential chains in a text is a difficult task, which requires a lot of concentration.
  • Note that this account of propositions (including the commitment to names being directly referential) entails that sentences that differ only with respect to coreferential names express the same proposition. Structured Propositions
  • two expressions are coreferent if they denote the same object or individual
Master English with Ease
Translate words instantly and build your vocabulary every day.
Boost Your
Learning
Master English with Ease
  • You skin laser treatment brightly be in my clothier, my frisbee and i introspection burp all the coreferential bolshy i vetchworm with you. Rational Review
  • This has the consequence that where a coreferential or bound zero anaphor may occur, the use of an overt pronoun will tend to be taken to solicit disjoint reference.
  • If the pronoun were coreferential with its antecedent, the indefinite “a donkey” would have to be a referential term, which seems unlikely, e.g. because the negation of Discourse Representation Theory
  • Supposition is a theory of reference and it is the coreferentiality of terms in the different sentences in a syllogism that is the decisive factor in determining whether the principle of uniform substitution is satisfied or not. The Statue of a Writer
  • They also have another property: aboutness or intentionality. (not intensionality, and not thinking of contexts in which coreferential terms are not substitutable salva veritate) Represent reality or some part of it as being thus and so. Backing Into an Evidentiary Standard for ID
  • The participle receives its case from the noun which it modifies, which must (as you point out) be coreferential with its subject.
  • We all know the “John cut himself while shaving” is correct, but stating the rule accurately and completely would require something like this: Given a sentence in which the subject and object of the verb are coreferential, you must substitute for the second of the two from the set of reflexive pronouns which matches the first in person, number, and gender. The Volokh Conspiracy » Against descriptivism and prescriptivism:
  • This has the consequence that where a coreferential or bound zero anaphor may occur, the use of an overt pronoun will tend to be taken to solicit disjoint reference.
  • They also have another property: aboutness or intentionality. (not intensionality, and not thinking of contexts in which coreferential terms are not substitutable salva veritate) Represent reality or some part of it as being thus and so. Backing Into an Evidentiary Standard for ID
  • In the latter case, a referential anaphor refers to what its antecedent refers to; the anaphor is thus said to be coreferential with its antecedent.
  • Two expressions are coreferent if they denote the same object or individual.
  • Here the coreferential argument is explicitly marked as patientive in the matrix clause.
  • This has the consequence that where a coreferential or bound zero anaphor may occur, the use of an overt pronoun will tend to be taken to solicit disjoint reference.

Report a problem

Please indicate a type of error

Additional information (optional):